Author: Kerby Anderson

Kerby Anderson
Donald Trump has nominated Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to lead the National Institute of Health (NIH). If you are not familiar with him, he is a Stanford University professor of medicine and health research policy.
Allysia Finley calls this the “revenge of the Covid lockdown skeptics.” During the pandemic and lockdowns, Dr. Bhattacharya attempted to inject some common sense into the government’s policies. The head of the NIH during that period was Dr. Francis Collins, who referred to the professor as a “fringe scientist.”
Dr. Bhattacharya, along with scientists from Harvard and Oxford, put together what came to be known as “The Great Barrington Declaration.” The tens of thousands of scientists expressed their “grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies.”
Once it was published, Francis Collins urged a “quick and devastating take down of its premises” in an email to Anthony Fauci. In a Washington Post interview, Dr. Collins denounced the declaration as a “fringe component of epidemiology” and further said it was “not mainstream science.”
Of course, we now know who was wrong. The lockdowns devastated the economy and stunted school children’s learning for a generation. And social media was all too willing to censor any medical view that contradicted the government’s mantra. Twitter blacklisted the professor.
Why didn’t others speak up? Unfortunately, there was a financial incentive to agree with rather than contradict Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci. It is all to fitting that Donald Trump wants to put Dr. Bhattacharya in charge of the NIH.

Kerby Anderson
Before the election, I would often do a feature on “problems the next administration will face no matter who is elected.” Now we know that it will be a Trump administration that will face these issues. One of the most difficult to resolve will be federal deficits.
Lyn Alden (author of Broken Money) has written about this and appeared on the Fox News program “Making Money with Charles Payne.” Federal deficits are hard to fix for many reasons.
First is the issue of Social Security. Put simply the math breaks down when population growth slows down. The ratio between those who pay into it and those who receive has steadily declined for decades. And the Social Security fund that was built up for decades is shrinking.
A second issue is healthcare spending. The US not only spends more per person on health care, but it also has the highest rate of people with multiple chronic conditions. The obesity rate is twice that of other developed countries.
The accumulated debt interest is a third major issue. For the past four decades, the US has had a rising debt/GDP ratio, while also having falling interest rates. Politicians aren’t likely to choose austerity, even if the government efficiency department recommends significant cuts. Therefore, increasing the money supply by printing more money becomes the only option.
This leads to a fourth issue: the financialization of tax receipts. Let’s assume the next administration could shrink the deficit through tax increases and spending cuts. It won’t have as much impact because asset prices in this country are more correlated to the performance of the stock market.
These are just a few reasons why the next administration will face significant obstacles in trying to reduce the size of federal deficits.

Kerby Anderson
Yesterday, I talked about some of the tests Glenn Beck proposes in his new book Propaganda Wars. The first three are the “liar-liar test,” the “what is a woman test,” and the “egg-throwing gorilla test.” If you don’t know what those are, you might consult the transcript for yesterday’s commentary.
His fourth test is the “bias test.” People and institutions are more likely to cite facts that support their ideological or religious views. If a secular, liberal news source reports something favorable to conservatives or Christians, it is likely to be true.
The fifth test he calls the “bloodthirsty tyrant test.” If someone supports or calls for violence, you should not trust the information. The mainstream media has frequently downplayed the violence and threats from Antifa. He argues that if you think your cause is so righteous it justifies burning cities down then you shouldn’t trust that source.
Another test is the “original source test.” This test is more difficult because you shouldn’t always take at face value a statement that isn’t a firsthand account. It takes time and patience to find an original source. Glenn Beck devotes a few pages to show how the false story of 500 people who died in a hospital in Gaza was repeated verbatim by multiple outlets.
A final test is the “crazy uncle test.” Along with Christmas carols and Thanksgiving turkeys, one American holiday tradition is getting trapped in a completely absurd conversation with a crazy uncle. Glenn Beck suggests we treat the entire social media industry as though it is a crazy uncle.
You will need wisdom and a degree of skepticism to navigate the propaganda wars in the 21st century.

Kerby Anderson
Propaganda Wars is the newest book by Glenn Beck. His opening chapter has a “Welcome to Clown World” section that will cause most readers to shake their heads and roll their eyes. His chapter on “The Propaganda Industrial Complex” is a warning for all of us to use discernment when using media. His later chapters address the problem of deepfakes and various other forms of deception.
One chapter that will be helpful to you is how to discover and uncover truth. He is often asked: how do I know who to trust? He provides seven simple tests that I will discuss today and tomorrow.
The first test he calls the “liar-liar test.” Put simply, if the media lied to you before, you should evaluate them with a higher level of scrutiny going forward. One example occurred in 2020 when multiple media outlets and 51 current and former government officials knowingly lied about the authenticity of the Hunter Biden laptop.
The second test he calls the “what is a woman test.” When an expert says something that is obviously wrong on an issue, you shouldn’t trust him or her on other topics. Reasonable people can disagree on many topics, but you don’t need to trust an expert without basic common sense.
He calls the third test the “egg-throwing gorilla test” which is a reference to clown world. When Larry Elder (who is black) ran for California Governor in 2021, he was attacked as being racist. One L.A. Times reporter claimed Elder had white supremacist worldview. A woman even went to one of Elder’s rallies wearing a gorilla mask and threw eggs at him.
As I often say on radio, look for trustworthy sources and view with great skepticism media that doesn’t have a good track record of honest reporting and commentary.

Kerby Anderson
As December 2024 is winding down, many Americans begin to think about their finances. First, they are considering what donations they might make before the end of the year. Second, they are looking to 2025 and thinking about developing a financial plan. Unfortunately, many of us don’t get past just thinking about developing a plan.
If you are eager to put together a sound financial plan, I recommend Forging Financial Freedom by Chad Hufford. He sets forth seven wealth building lessons he has learned. He argues that financial freedom is not a finish line. He reminds us that “when retirement is your finish line, there is a tendency to put life on ‘pause’ until you realize that achievement.”
He recommends that you get busy “framing your future,” which requires clarity and persistence. You should put your future together, one piece at a time. And you should also know when “enough is enough” by “creating balance along your financial journey.”
Another of his recommendations is to “farm your orchard.” He explains that wealth is like an orchard. When a farmer plants an orchard, the trees are small and produce little fruit. Financial productivity is a long process. Unfortunately, some people are “gambling when they should be farming.”
An important financial battle takes place in your mind. That why he talks about “winning the war in your mind.” Quoting Hebrews 12:1, he encourages us to lay aside encumbrances. Often addition comes from subtraction.
Finally, he reminds us that “persistence beats perfection.” The pressure of perfect can cause us to try to tackle too much, which is unsustainable. We need to develop healthy habits and a healthy lifestyle.
Your financial future is in your hands. Get a copy of Forging Financial Freedom and get to work.

Kerby Anderson
The Western world is facing a birth rate crisis. Wilfred Reilly says these young adults resemble captive panda bears who must be persuaded to mate. He cites a psychological study that revealed that roughly 50 percent of young men have never or almost never approached a woman to ask for a date.
Even if men and women get married, they are less likely to have children. The fertility rate has been dropping for decades. That is why Edward Ring wrote a discouraging essay, “Give Me Fertility, Or Give Me Death.”
Unmarried, childless women are much more likely to vote for a Democratic candidate who supports abortion as “reproductive health care.” A recent study by Morgan Stanley estimated that by 2030, around 45 percent of women between ages 25 and 44 are projected to be single and childless.
And these trends are taking place through all the developed world and in much of the developing world. The U.S. has a fertility rate of 1.84, which is better than the 1.24 fertility rate of European countries like Italy or the 1.17 fertility rate for Singapore.
Some liberal women have embraced the “4B” movement that originated in South Korea that says no to sex, dating, marriage, and children. This is not a good trend. The projected fertility rate of South Korean women this year has dropped to 0.68. The population of South Korea is imploding.
It is time for pastors and other church leaders to remind Christians that children are a gift from God (Psalm 127:3) and they are arrows in our quiver (Psalm 127:4). The secular world may not value marriage and family, which is why the church must teach biblical principles to the next generation.

Kerby Anderson
Decades ago, Ronald Reagan observed, “No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth.”
This is the challenge that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy face as they lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The two of them explained their plan to reform the government in their Wall Street Journal op-ed. They are assisting the Trump transition team in identifying and hiring a team of small-government crusaders who will work with the Office of Management and Budget.
They aren’t the first outsiders to attempt to trim the bureaucracy. J. Peter Grace led the Grace Commission, that filed its report with Ronald Reagan in 1984. President Obama formed the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (often called Simpson–Bowles in honor of the two co-chairs). Neither commission had much of an impact on the size and scope of the federal bureaucracy.
Both Musk and Ramaswamy believe they have a better chance of success due to two Supreme Court rulings concerning federal regulations. They will present a list of regulations to President Trump who will pause the enforcement of those regulations by executive action.
They also challenge the conventional assumption that civil-service protections stop a president from firing federal workers. They don’t plan to target specific employees but merely reduce the size of the department. And they point to other Supreme Court cases to support their belief.
Trimming the administrative state won’t be easy, but I think they may have found an open door that will allow them to succeed in reforming the federal government.

Kerby Anderson
Gerard Butler wrote in the Wall Street Journal that he hopes that “Four More Years of Trump May Make America Normal Again.” He begins with the Hans Christian Andersen story of the “Emperor’s New Clothes.” A small boy calls out the truth in the charade. Gerard Butler points to five items of invisible attire we have had to wear for too long.
First is “the idea that people who have stolen into this country illegally should be showered with all the rights and benefits of citizens.” We have been told we cannot deny them those rights and must give them sanctuary in our already strained cities.
Second is the idea that we cannot take advantage of our vast reservoirs of natural energy resources. Instead, we must restrain ourselves from using the energy reserves beneath our feet
Third is “the idea that after a century and a half of [racial] progress, we are suddenly obliged to believe that America is as oppressive as it was in 1619.” And we must believe that the “best way to right the past wrong of treating people based on the color of their skin is to treat people based on the color of their skin.”
Fourth is the idea “that children should, without parental consultation or consent, be free to choose their gender.” And they should “be assisted by the state in committing acts of self-mutilation.”
Fifth, is “the idea that democracy and freedom are best protected by denying people the right to express certain views that the authorities deem misinformation and by weaponizing the law against political opponents.”
If we can reverse some of these harmful and erroneous ideas, it is indeed possible that American might become normal again.

Kerby Anderson
As we all know, this country is carrying a national debt of $36 trillion. The Bible warns us about debt. Proverbs 22:7 says, “The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is a servant to the lender.” We need to do something rather than ignoring our debt problem.
Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) has proposed that the US put together a bitcoin strategic reserve. She has introduced the BITCOIN Act in the last session of Congress and will reintroduce it again in January. This next time, it may get a hearing because of the change in the US Senate and the interest from a new Trump administration.
She proposes that the US keep the bitcoin they have recovered and purchase approximately 200,000 bitcoin a year. She predicts, “…just by converting money we already have into bitcoin and holding them for 20 years. If we did that with 5 percent of all the bitcoin that will ever exist (which is roughly a million bitcoin), we could cut our debt in half in 20 years.”
The other benefit, she explains, “We would have an asset that’s growing in value while our own dollar is decreasing in value. We could shore up the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.” This, she believes, would help protect the country against inflation and protect the US dollar worldwide.
Her proposal will have its critics, as illustrated by one article with the title, “The delusions behind a bitcoin strategic reserve.” But the idea deserves an honest discussion and evaluation in Congress.
Perhaps you have seen the graph that illustrates that it took 221 years to reach a national debt of $12 trillion and then shows we have added $12 trillion since 2020. We have a debt problem, and this is one way to address it.

Kerby Anderson
Now that we are in the last month of the year, let me recommend what you may want to plan to do in 2025. I would recommend you read through the Bible in one year. Here are two resources from Pastor Jack Graham that will help you do that.
First, he is the author of the new book, The Jesus Book. He provides ten chapters that will help you read through the Bible. He begins by helping us understand that we can trust the Bible, and then provides a big picture of the Bible. He provides chapters on how reading the Bible can provide hope and reassurance. It can also help you discern God’s will for you.
Pastor Graham gives you guidance for how to read the Bible daily with a practical approach to Bible study. He quotes from an applications pyramid found in the Life Application Study Bible. As you study God’s Word, you will need to focus on the: people, place, plot, point, principles, present, parallels, person, and plan. He also reminds us of the Bereans, who are described in Acts 17 as people who searched the Scriptures daily. We need consistency in reading God’s Word.
A second resource comes from the podcast, The Bible in a Year with Jack Graham. It can be found at the official BibleinaYear.com podcast, which you can find with the Apple or Spotify podcast apps. In each episode, you will learn how to apply these biblical principles to your life. The audio provides you with a reading of the key passage, along with some dramatic material and orchestral music. That is followed by a profound commentary from Pastor Graham.
Reading the Bible through the year will be a rewarding experience for you. Of course, you don’t have to wait until January 1 to get started. You can start right now. Let’s get started.

Kerby Anderson
A book I have been reading by Mitchell Askew has a chapter with the arresting title, “Fiat Money Destroyed the Nuclear Family.” It is a reminder of the devastating social effects from the economy due to the decreasing value of the dollar.
A nuclear family consists of a father, mother, and children. The family is the foundation of society. He argues that the rise of fiat currency has weakened the nuclear family. And he also acknowledges there are other factors, such as shifting cultural attitudes toward marriage and family.
The decreasing value of the dollar, he argues, has turned America into a nation of dual-income households. It is becoming less and less possible for someone earning an average income to support their family.
We have seen this generational shift over the last century. Askew observed that his grandparents (born in the 1930s) raised four children on a single income from his grandfather’s job. Grandmother stayed home and was able to raise the children.
They were also able to own a home. As I have mentioned in previous commentaries, home ownership is out of reach for a majority of Americans. The median family income today is not enough to provide a 10 percent down payment and mortgage payments not greater than 30 percent of their income.
The price of a home in the 1950s and 1960s was equal to about three years’ worth of income. Today, the price of a home is equal to at least ten years’ worth of income. House prices went up, but wages stayed flat.
Finally, the lack of financial stability dissuades would-be parents from having children. The latest surveys found that “finances” were the major reason married couples decided not to have children or at least postponed having them.
America’s families are in decline because the America dollar is in decline.

Kerby Anderson
Each year, we take time from our busy lives to celebrate a day of Thanksgiving. Though many holidays have become secular celebrations, this holiday still retains much of its historic religious overtones.
A day of Thanksgiving was set aside by the Pilgrims who founded Plymouth Colony. Life was hard in the New World. Half of the Pilgrims died in the first terrible winter. After the first harvest was completed, Governor William Bradford proclaimed a day of Thanksgiving and prayer. By 1623, a day of fasting and prayer during a period of drought was changed to one of Thanksgiving because the rain came during their prayers. The custom prevailed in New England and eventually became a national holiday.
Religious freedom is one of the lessons of Thanksgiving. In 1606, William Brewster led a group of Separatists to Leiden (in the Netherlands) to escape religious persecution in England. After living in Leiden for more than ten years, some members of the group voted to emigrate to America. Having been blown off course from their intended landing in Virginia by a terrible storm, the Pilgrims landed at Cape Cod in November 1620. While still on the ship, the Pilgrims signed the Mayflower Compact.
The Mayflower Compact provides the second lesson of Thanksgiving: the importance of political freedom.  On November 11, 1620, Governor William Bradford and the leaders on the Mayflower signed the Mayflower Compact before setting foot on land. They wanted to acknowledge God’s sovereignty in their lives and their need to obey Him.
During this Thanksgiving season, let’s return to the wisdom of the Pilgrims. They valued their freedom and were willing to endure hardship in order to come to this country and freely worship. Let us thank God for these freedoms and be willing to defend them against all who would seek to take them away.

Kerby Anderson
Thanksgiving is tomorrow, and I suspect that you are doing lots of things to get ready for this special day. Let me suggest you add one more item to your to-do list. Visit our website and download a copy of my Thanksgiving Quiz.
Thanksgiving is a wonderful time to gather as a family, but I also believe it can be a great time to teach our children and grandchildren about America’s godly heritage. I created this short quiz to be a conversation-starter around the Thanksgiving table.
We used to go around the table before the meal and ask our children to tell us what they were thankful for. After a few years of hearing about how they were thankful for their cat, their doll, and their video games, I knew we needed to do something else.
The Thanksgiving Quiz was born out of that frustration. It has twenty questions and answers on the Pilgrims and the Mayflower Compact as well as some questions and answers about the Christian heritage of America.
Who were the Pilgrims and why did they leave Europe for America? Why did they celebrate Thanksgiving? What is the Mayflower Compact, and why is it significant? What lessons did the Pilgrims learn about work and even free enterprise? How did the Christian faith influence America? These are just a few of the sorts of questions that you can ask around the table and give short answers.
Perhaps it is time to recapture the importance of Thanksgiving. On the bicentennial celebration of the landing of the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock, Daniel Webster, on December 22, 1820, declared the following: “Let us not forget the religious character of our origin. Our fathers were brought hither by their high veneration for the Christian religion. They journeyed by its light and labored in its hope. They sought to incorporate its principles with the elements of their society, and to diffuse its influence through all their institutions, civil, political, or literary.”
It is my hope this quiz will help your family see the importance of Thanksgiving.

Kerby Anderson
Earlier this month, Dominic Pino wrote about “Milton Friedman’s Revenge.” His argument was that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris got the economic policy they wanted and the voters hated. It’s worth looking back to understand why the election went the way it did.
Milton Friedman was an economist best known for saying that inflation is “always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.” He believed that inflation occurs when the money supply increases faster than output.
Four years ago, candidate Joe Biden announced, “Milton Friedman isn’t running the show anymore.” Of course, Friedman wasn’t running the show even before Biden was elected. But once Biden was elected, he proceeded to spend money and run up deficits. By 2021, the New Republic proclaimed: “The End of Friedmanomics.”
First came the American Rescue Plan Act, followed by an infrastructure law, the CHIPS Act, and then finally the intentionally misnamed Inflation Reduction Act. Biden spent more and more federal money. Democrats even invented the word “Bidenomics” to describe their economic theory. The Biden administration ran up budget deficits which as a share of GDP were greater than those in the Great Depression.
Rising inflation was inevitable. As I have mentioned in previous commentaries, economist Larry Summers warned that the American Rescue Plan would “set off inflationary pressures of a kind we have not seen in a generation.” Someone should have paid attention to him since he served as Barack Obama’s Treasury Secretary. But his warning was mocked. He was right, and the skeptics were wrong.
When voters were given an opportunity to express their opinion about Bidenomics, two thirds (68%) of voters in exit polls said the economy was “not good” or “poor.” That’s why we can call this “Milton Friedman’s Revenge.”

Kerby Anderson
Donald Trump hasn’t even been sworn into office, and yet governors in blue states and the legacy media are already criticizing a deportation program that hasn’t even begun. Unfortunately, some of the comments aren’t merely hostile but grossly inaccurate. If we are going to have a worthwhile debate about deportation, then let’s get accurate facts on the table.
First, Tom Homan, the newly designated “border czar,” has made his three-step process very clear. The primary focus will be the deportation of national security threats, with a secondary focus on individuals with a criminal record in this country or their country of origin.
Second, there are more than 1.2 million people in this country illegally that have had full legal due process and have received a final deportation order from an immigration judge. Those were the numbers as of September a year ago. The actual number may be close to 1.5 million to 1.6 million.
Byron York points out that in an ironic twist, the Trump administration may end up using the Mayorkas Memorandum created by the current Secretary of Homeland Security in the Biden administration. The memo lays out the rules for deporting illegal immigrants.
It sets as the first priorities the “apprehension and removal of noncitizens who are a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security.” It explains that the first group was terrorists and spies. The second group were criminals. The third group were those who are a threat to border security. Those would be immigrants who were apprehended after November 2020.
Critics are already howling about the possibility of deportations, and the decibels are certain to increase. But Americans need to know that these first deportations will be the removal of people most of us don’t want in this country.

Kerby Anderson
Next week is Thanksgiving week. But many Americans are dreading the annual ritual of gathering families together because of the 2024 election. You might hope that the shock, grief, and anger would subside after this election, but this post-election distress continues.
CBS did a story on “Post-election Emotions.” It offered expert tips and resources to manage a person’s mental health after the 2024 elections. Liberal women say it is “time to learn from the Koreans and adopt the 4B movement” in this country (by shaving their heads and denouncing men).
An article in Psychiatric Times, reflected on a similar experience after Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election. Her followers talked about their feeling of betrayal and felt they were living in an alternate reality.
Journalist Mark Halperin predicted that the reaction to the Trump victory might be the cause of the biggest mental health crisis in the history of this country. In an interview he did with Tucker Carlson, he explained that “tens of millions of people will question their connection to the nation and their connection to other human beings.”
The election has rattled their vision of the future. He added, “I don’t think it will be kind of a passing thing that by the inauguration will be fine. I think it will be sustained and unprecedented.” He even thinks that we will see violence. “I think there’ll be workplace fights. There’ll be fights at kids’ birthday parties. I think there’ll be protests that will turn violent.”
We can hope that his fearful prophecy does not come to pass, but we should be prepared for the social turmoil ahead. As I have been traveling around the country, many people say they are concerned about the possibility of conflict because of the polarized nature of our society.  Thanksgiving week might provide a glimpse into the future.

Kerby Anderson
Chuck Bentley is the CEO of Crown Financial and the host of the daily radio broadcast, My MoneyLife. He was on my radio program last week to talk about this question he received from a listener: “I am really concerned with what Elon Musk said about America heading toward bankruptcy. Do you think there is anything we need to do if he turns out to be correct?”
Elon Musk has said this on a recent All-In Summit hosted by the All-In Podcast: “America is going bankrupt extremely quickly, and everyone seems to be sort of whistling past the graveyard on this one.”
Chuck Bentley attributes much of the problem to the promotion and popularity of what is called “modern monetary theory.” The economists and politicians believe our currency is like Monopoly Money. They argue that we can ignore deficits and ignore the growing national debt since the government will always be able to print enough money to pay its debts. But he warns we are headed for a downward debt loop.
During the program, I explained that we aren’t the only people concerned about this. Chuck Bentley quotes from an article by Les Rubin who admitted: “The government CAN pay their loans due to their unlimited ability to borrow—for now—or print more money, as long as other countries and investors will continue to buy our bonds.” But in the article, he then warned that it will eventually stop and “we will have to default, leading to severe consequences.”
Both Chuck Bentley and I concluded that if Elon Musk and the proposed Government Efficiency Commission cannot reduce spending, then the economic future for this country isn’t very bright.

Kerby Anderson
Now that the 2024 election is in the rearview mirror, there are some steps we need to take to improve our future elections. Much of this needed to be done four years ago, but anytime you talked about improving our electoral process, you were usually accused of trying to change the election. Now that this election was more decisive, it provides an opportunity to make some needed changes.
That’s why I invited Hans von Spakovsky to come on my radio program. He was a member of the Federal Election Commission, is the senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and is the manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative.
When he is asked about the state of election integrity, he responds that we are in better shape nationally than we were last time, but much depends on what state you live in and vote in. Sadly, he also pointed out there is also a problem with state attorneys general and secretaries of state who are unwilling to enforce good state election laws.
On my program, he talked about the fact that he often is tasked with briefing European election observers. They are shocked and astounded to find out that two states with some of the nation’s largest populations do NOT require ID to vote.
Every state has work to do. He has put together an “Election Integrity Scorecard” that analyzed all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It provided an assessment of laws, regulations, and administrative practices of each state. He reported that no state scored 100 when he launched the Scorecard, and that is still the case.
Our goal for elections in this country should be “to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat.” Before the next important election, let’s get to work.

Kerby Anderson
The election of Donald Trump will advance the cause of religious liberty. That is the conclusion of First Liberty President Kelly Shackelford. On my radio program he talked about Trump policies in his first term that offer hope for the future of religious liberty and then quoted from the speech Trump gave at the National Religious Broadcasters Convention.
We’ve provided a link to an article with a complete list of policies, along with a link to a video by Kelly Shackelford. Here are just a few reasons why the future of religious liberty in this country looks bright.
Former President Trump’s executive orders on religious liberty made a difference when he was in office. His 2017 Executive Order on Protecting Religious Liberty was able to advance religious freedom across all federal executive agencies. His 2019 Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism prohibited discrimination against Jewish communities and believers.
Kelly Shackelford also talked about the establishment of the HHS Conscience and Religious Freedom division. One of his former employees was able to direct the agency’s efforts to protect religious freedom and people of faith in the healthcare industry.
What will a Trump administration do in the future? Trump’s speech at the National Religious Broadcasters Convention delineated seven major actions.
One was the development of a Religious Liberty Task Force. Trump explained that he would “create a new federal task force [to fight] anti-Christian bias” and it would “investigate all forms of illegal discrimination, harassment, and persecution against Christians in America.” He also promised he would protect Christians, religious symbols, and religious expression and speech.
The election of Donald Trump is good news for those of us concerned about the future of religious liberty in America.

Kerby Anderson
Donald Trump won, and Kamala Harris lost, for many reasons. Certainly, the economy was one of the major reasons. Pundits and economists tried to tell the voters that the economy was doing just fine. The voters didn’t agree. Neither did the financial markets. Stocks rose immediately the moment it was obvious that Trump won.
The editors of The Wall Street Journal argued that the stock market rally suggested “a groundswell of growth optimism. Voters have taken off the table a big tax increase and continued regulatory barrage.” Voters and investors were fearful of looming higher taxes and had already seen enough of a regulatory assault that took place under Biden-Harris.
The editors do warn that stocks could fall in the future if the Trump policies turn out to be a disappointment. Concern over tariffs might be the next concern on Wall Street and on main street. But those concerns pale in comparison to the last few years of the highest inflation in 40 years and lower real wages. If you run the numbers, inflation-adjusted weekly earnings remain lower than when President Biden took office.
Inflation wasn’t the only issue; so were interest rates. High interest rates made it even more difficult to buy a home or to afford a new car. The average mortgage payment doubled over the last four years. “The bottom 40 percent of earners accounted for 6 percent of new auto purchases last year, compared to 18 percent in 2019.”
Millions of voters who didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020 voted for him this time. A significant percentage of them “never voted for a Republican for President in their lives.” They were ready to say bye to Bidenomics.